At the World Economic Forum in Davos in January 2026, debates about stablecoins and private digital money moved firmly into the political mainstream. While the digital euro was not the subject of a standalone announcement, the tone and content of the discussions highlighted why the European Central Bank considers a public digital currency increasingly important for Europe’s monetary future.
Panels and side events at Davos were dominated by the rapid rise of dollar-denominated stablecoins and their growing role in global payments and capital markets. Industry leaders, including Coinbase chief executive Brian Armstrong, argued that blockchain-based money could increasingly challenge traditional national currencies, especially in cross-border transactions and emerging markets. In that vision, privately issued digital dollars and crypto assets play a central role in the future monetary system.
For central bankers and policymakers, that narrative triggered familiar concerns. Officials from international institutions and central banks warned that large-scale adoption of foreign stablecoins could weaken domestic monetary control, complicate financial stability oversight and increase dependence on non-European payment infrastructures. These risks, long discussed in policy papers, were framed at Davos as immediate rather than theoretical.
Against this backdrop, European officials used the forum to reinforce the strategic logic behind the digital euro. Senior figures from the European Central Bank, including Executive Board members, reiterated in public remarks around the Davos meetings that the digital euro is intended to preserve the role of public money in an increasingly digital economy. The core message was consistent with earlier ECB communications: if money and payments go digital, central bank money must remain usable in everyday transactions, not only in wholesale markets.
The ECB’s position is that a digital euro would complement cash, not replace it, while offering a European alternative to privately issued stablecoins that are typically linked to the US dollar. From the central bank’s perspective, this is not primarily about competing with crypto firms on innovation, but about ensuring monetary sovereignty, resilience and a level playing field in payments across the euro area.
Davos also exposed the geopolitical dimension of the debate. Stablecoins backed by US assets were repeatedly cited as an example of how financial influence can be exported through technology. For Europe, this reinforced arguments that relying too heavily on foreign digital payment solutions could deepen existing dependencies on non-European providers, an issue the ECB has already highlighted in the context of card payments and digital wallets.
At the same time, scepticism remains within parts of Europe’s banking sector and political sphere. Critics argue that the digital euro’s benefits for consumers are still unclear and warn of potential disruption to bank funding models. These concerns were not resolved in Davos, but the discussions made clear that the status quo is also not risk-free in a world where private digital money is scaling rapidly.
With EU legislative negotiations on the digital euro ongoing in 2026, the World Economic Forum served as a reminder of what is at stake. The debate in Davos suggested that the digital euro is no longer just a technical project under development in Frankfurt and Brussels, but part of a broader global contest over who shapes the future of money.
Related: ECB Outlines Core Design Features for the Digital Euro in New Technical Annex